Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Job Interview: Pace your thinking, don’t go too fast, it could ruin your chances!

So, you have a job interview or a big meeting coming up with the boss or an important client. You’ve done your homework and you’re prepared, primed, and pumped up. But have you thought about your thinking speed?

We all know that interviews and high-stakes meetings can be stressful, and when nerves flare up, our tendency is to think and talk too fast, leading to our blowing that meeting that we prepared so hard for.

In his now classic book “Thinking, Fast and Slow,” Daniel Kahneman takes a deep dive into how we think – and teaches us how we can think more effectively. According to Kahneman, one of the biggest problems is that we tend to think too fast.

When your brain reacts and responds automatically and instinctively – almost thinking without really thinking, that’s what he calls “thinking fast.” This is how we think most of the time. On the other hand, “thinking slow” is when your brain hits the pause button and takes a moment to consciously reason, consider, question, analyze, and decide, before responding or acting. Of course there are stupid entities out there who would have some atrocious reasons to justify their thinking fast and effective.

Of course “thinking fast” is a good thing. We couldn’t possibly – and wouldn’t want to – have to over-analyze every little thing before responding. But, on the flipside, how often do we make mistakes because we jump to conclusions or have knee-jerk reactions when we might have benefitted from pausing, even momentarily, to devise a more thoughtful and well-considered response?
So how can you leverage the power of “thinking slow” in your next job interview or meeting? One way is by simply remembering this extremely effective behavioral interviewing technique called “PARLA.”

With the PARLA technique, you might start by finding out more specifically what the job opening entails; and then, focusing on just one of the biggest challenges you might face in that position, you respond with a real-life story that illustrates how you’ve successfully solved similar challenges before. PARLA stands for Problem, Action, Result, Learning, & Application:

P – Problem: Here’s a problem or situation I faced previously that’s similar to that of this role;
A – Action: Here’s the action I took;
R – Result: Here’s the result or outcome of that action;
L – Learning: Here’s what I learned from that experience;
A – Application: And (the most important and relevant part to the interviewer) here’s how I would apply what I learned from that prior experience in this new role.

Let’s say the interviewer asks you, “Why do you think you can do this job and why should I hire you over anybody else?” What often happens, in your excitement and enthusiasm to convince the interviewer that you’re the right person for the job, you excitedly blurt out something like, “Because I have a degree in x, and five years’ experience, and I’m a hard worker and team player, and blah blah blah.” Not only are you thinking fast, you’re talking fast, and often just rambling on. And that’s what everyone else does.

Instead, differentiate yourself by pausing for a brief moment and thinking slow…slow enough to come up with a thoughtful and winning PARLA-based response that’ll make you stand out from the crowd. Focus on one – just one – key aspect of the job, and respond with something like this:
“You had mentioned that one of the key responsibilities and greatest challenges of this position was X. Well, one time, in my last job I faced a similar challenge. Here’s what I did… Here’s what the outcome was… Here’s what I learned… And here’s how I would apply what I learned in this role….

Even if things didn’t go well in the Results phase, what’s important is that you took an Action to address a Problem, and you Learned something valuable that you can Apply going forward. And, in truth, that’s really what the interviewer is looking for.

By the way, PARLA is not just for use when BEING interviewed; it is actually a classic behavioral interviewing technique that was originally designed for the interviewer to use to interview YOU. If an interviewer ever starts a sentence with, “Tell me about a time when you faced a situation in which…” you will know that that is exactly what they’re doing…and what they are looking for in terms of a response! So (not to give away any behind-the-scenes interviewing secrets), now that you are aware of this very popular interviewing methodology, you are now equipped to respond more effectively going forward.

Seizing the opportunity to tell a true, well-structured personal story using the PARLA format will capture and hold the interviewer’s attention, shows that you can think on your feet, and demonstrates with poise and confidence that you have what it takes to do the job…because you’ve been there before.

That’s the power of “thinking slow” in action.


“You have to learn the rules of the game; then you have play better than anyone else”

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Thinking about Thinking (Smart thinking enabled): De Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats”

Of all the different management, leadership, communication, innovation, and thinking tools, tips and techniques that I’ve learned over the years, nothing has affected me more, or has had more practical applications, than Edward de Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” model.

De Bono, the guru of “thinking about thinking,” originated this framework that I now use, either consciously or unconsciously, literally every single day. It’s one of the best examples of how we can use visual and metaphorical thinking and communicating to solve real-world challenges.

The model in brief: There are six metaphorical “hats” — each a different color. Each hat represents a different type of thinking. By metaphorically taking off or putting on a different hat, you can intentionally and strategically switch to a different type of thinking.

Here are the six hat colors, and a brief overview of what type of thinking each represents:
1. White Hat: Neutral; objective; facts; data; information; objectivity
2. Red Hat: Emotion; gut feeling; intuition; passion; subjectivity
3. Black Hat: Cons; critical; caution; risks; costs; weaknesses; disadvantages
4. Yellow Hat: Pros; optimism; benefits; strengths; advantages
5. Green Hat: Creativity; innovation; brainstorming; new ideas; possibilities
6. Blue Hat: Process; structure; thinking about thinking; next steps

The Six Thinking Hats method can be applied in many different types of situations, for example:
  • In a meeting: as a formalized, structured process (e.g., a group brainstorming or strategy session)
  • In a one-on-one discussion: as a common language that will encourage dialogue and minimize conflict
  • In your own mind: as a way to frame your own thinking, separate fact from emotion, and make better decisions
When used in a group, it enables what De Bono calls “parallel thinking,” which occurs when all members metaphorically “wear” the same color hat at the same time. This dramatically improves communication, minimizes conflict, and fosters innovation.

How do the Six Thinking Hats do this? The best way to understand it is through a real-life illustration:
Say you’re in a meeting, trying to reach a decision. Instead of the normal chaos and conflict caused by endless debate, cross-talk, shooting down ideas, etc., what if we were able to say:
“Let’s temporarily put aside our Red Hats (our emotional reactions), our Black (negative/critical) and Yellow (positive/supportive) opinions, and all put on our White Hats to first objectively identify the objective facts and relevant data, before we start jumping to possible solutions (Green Hat) and proposing next steps (Blue Hat).”

Once agreed, from there the group can efficiently, and with minimal conflict and debate, run the situation through this simple and logically sequenced series of questions:
1. White Hat: What are the facts about the situation at hand?
2. Red Hat: How do people feel, emotionally, about the situation?
3. Black Hat: What’s not working — and why?
4. Yellow Hat: What is working – and why?
5. Green Hat: What’s new (ideas, possibilities)?
6. Blue Hat: What’s next (where do we go from here)?
(Note: You don’t necessarily always have to use the hats in this exact sequence; but this is an example of a very common and effective approach.)

By enabling parallel thinking —  by having everyone wear the the same color hat at the same time (and headed together in the same direction) — you will see how much more orderly your meetings will be, and how much more quickly you can reach decisions and get things done!
And if you assign one person in the meeting to be the Blue Hat leader, that person (regardless of organizational role or rank) will serve to make sure that things run smoothly, stay on track, and that everyone plays by the rules.

Using this methodology, my company and clients have successfully conducted numerous executive-level strategy meetings, facilitated cross-functional team-building and brainstorming sessions, and helped hundreds of individuals maximize the effectiveness of their own decision-making skills, along with their ability to more effectively conceive and communicate ideas.

Here’s a question that may hit close to home: How might you use the Six Thinking Hats in your job search?

Let’s say that you were presented with a potential job opportunity. What kind of question might each Thinking Hat pose to help you make the best possible decision?

1. White Hat: What are the objective facts about the position and the company (title, salary, benefits, location, industry, work environment, department, new manager, etc.)?
2. Red Hat: How do I feel about this opportunity; what is my gut telling me (am I excited, nervous, hesitant, concerned, etc)?
3. Black Hat: What don‘t I like about it, what’s bad about it — and why (i.e., what are the negatives or concerns associated with the White Hat facts and my Red Hat feelings)?
4. Yellow Hat: What do I like about it, what’s good about it – and why (what are the positives associated with the White Hat facts and my Red Hat feelings)?
5. Green Hat: What are the various options, alternatives, choices available to me (i.e., what’s going through my mind in terms of what-ifs, and out-of-the-box possibilities; what does it look like if I visualize actually taking this job)?
6. Blue Hat: What are the next steps; where do I go from here (when do I have to make a decision by, what do I have to do next, what actions should I take)?

Although this is just one simple and common example, you can easily see how using the Six Thinking Hats to frame your thinking can go a long way toward maximizing your effectiveness – and enhancing your confidence – when it comes to making any decision.

It is important to note, however, that while it takes just a few minutes to learn this seemingly simple model, it takes time, training, and much practice to truly master it.


A leader is best when people barely know he exists, when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves. - Lao Tzu